-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29
[release-4.19] OCPBUGS-57086: [Default Catalog Consistency Test]: Cherry-picks for Catalog Tests: Fix JUnit format, rename test suite, and enable Catalog Tests for Sippy/TRT integration #374
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[release-4.19] OCPBUGS-57086: [Default Catalog Consistency Test]: Cherry-picks for Catalog Tests: Fix JUnit format, rename test suite, and enable Catalog Tests for Sippy/TRT integration #374
Conversation
…ut format to allow generate xml
…uite and small cleanups
@camilamacedo86: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-57019, which is valid. 7 validation(s) were run on this bug
No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira ([email protected]), skipping review request. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. This pull request references OPRUN-3914 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target either version "4.19." or "openshift-4.19.", but it targets "4.20" instead. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
@camilamacedo86: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-57019, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
@camilamacedo86: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-57086, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 7 validation(s) were run on this bug
No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira ([email protected]), skipping review request. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
/hold until we get merged: #372 |
@camilamacedo86: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-57086, which is valid. 7 validation(s) were run on this bug
No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira ([email protected]), skipping review request. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
/hold cancel |
@oceanc80 We will need your help on this one :-) |
@camilamacedo86: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
@camilamacedo86: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-57086, which is valid. 7 validation(s) were run on this bug
No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira ([email protected]), skipping review request. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
/jira refresh |
@jianzhangbjz: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-57086, which is valid. 7 validation(s) were run on this bug
No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira ([email protected]), skipping review request. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
/label cherry-pick-approved |
/label backport-risk-assessed |
Is the title correct? "4.17"? |
/approve |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: camilamacedo86, tmshort The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/lgtm |
416a2d3
into
openshift:release-4.19
@camilamacedo86: #374 failed to apply on top of branch "release-4.18":
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER] Distgit: ose-olm-operator-controller |
[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER] Distgit: ose-olm-catalogd |
/cherrypick release-4.18 release-4.17
How to validate those changes
To know more about those tests see: https://docs.google.com/document/d/10aLllNnN24XFBbRwWlXIN_nLLKU68GOnBANEygExcCk/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.x3tfh25grvnv